在线翻译
其实对于大学扩招,是应该分开而论的。在微观上,或许存在着.. 翻译
原文(简体中文):
其实对于大学扩招,是应该分开而论的。在微观上,或许存在着许多质量上的问题。但是,在宏观上来看,就能够普遍提高我国的国民素质。
再而论质量问题,主要就是资源和人口的矛盾所引致,那就是双方的问题。解决问题也应该是双方的去解决,不能只归咎到扩招上。毕竟还有师资力量的问题和我国的教学改革制度种种的问题呀!
这就像是社保要减低事业单位的退休金一样,都是逆转的。而社会应该是朝前发展。我们是应该进步,并且在进步的同时解决阻碍进步的问题。
我认为,我国大学教育虽然不及美国的质量,但是对于我个人而言 更多:https://www.bmcx.com/ ,上了大学比没上好很多啊!这不是为了文凭,而是真的能够认识更多的知识,视野也会更加的开阔。
这就是受到大学教育和没有的区别。
在宏观来说,即使大学生的质量不是那么的尽如人意,但是相对一个大国来说,目前应该做的就是全面提高国民的整体素质不是吗?只有整体提上去,国家才有更好的发展。只有那么一些精英,然后施行精英管治,那跟古代的愚民政策其实也就没有了区别。
也许大家会说,可以在高中阶段进行像我们大学的教育模式,但是这在高考的教育机制里面是根本无法实施的。所以归根到底就是教育制度的问题。
翻译结果(英语)1:
In fact, university enrollment should be separated in terms of At the micro level, there may be many quality problems. However, in the macro point of view, a general increase in the quality of the citizens of our country.
And then in terms of quality problems, mainly caused by the contradiction between resources and population, that is, the two sides. Solve the problem should be two sides to solve, can not be attributed to the enrollment. There is still the question of the teachers and teaching reform the system of our country's various problems!
This is like a social security institutions to reduce the pension, are reversed. The community should move forward. We should progress,In progress at the same time to solve the problems that impede progress.
I think that university education in China is less than the quality of the United States, but for me personally, went to college not Shanghao ah! This is not a diploma 更多:https://www.bmcx.com/ , but really be able to recognize the more knowledge, vision will be more open.
This is subject to university education and no difference.
At the macro, even if the quality of university students is not so satisfactory, compared to a big country, however, should do now is to fully enhance the population's overall quality is not you? Only as a whole to go up, the countries have a better development. Only some of the elite.Then the implementation of the elite governance, that with the ancient obscurantist In fact, there is no difference.
Perhaps we may say, like our university education in high school mode, but this mechanism inside in the entrance of the education can not be implemented. So the final analysis, the education system.
翻译结果(英语)2:
For enrollment at the University, it should be separated and on the. On the smallest scale, there may be many quality problems. However, in looking at the macro-, can generally improve the people's quality.
On the quality problems, mainly due to contradictions between resources and population, that is the problem between the two sides. To solve the problem should also be parties to resolve, on not only due to the enrollment. After all, there are problems of teachers and teaching reform of China's system of various problems!
It is like social security to reduce the pensions of the public institutions, are reversed. Should be in front of the community development. We should progress,In progress at the same time overcome barriers to progress and problems.
I think, though not as university education in China United States quality 更多:https://www.bmcx.com/ , but for me personally, to College much no choice Ah! This is not a diploma, but really to know more knowledge, vision will become more open.
This is subject to university education and there is no difference.
Macro, even if the quality is not so ideal for college students, but a great power, should do at present is to comprehensively improve the overall quality of the national right? Only whole, countries have better development. Only some of the elite,And the purpose of elite rule, with ancient Obscurantism in fact there is no difference.
Maybe you will say, can be like our University high school model of education, but the education system there is no implementation in the entrance examination. So in the final analysis is the question of education system.
翻译结果(英语)3:
Actually to university student enrollment, is yet to part. In on microscopic, maybe there are many quality problems. But, in the macro perspective, can generally improved our national quality.
far more quality problem, the main thing is the contradiction between population and resources caused, and that is the problem.Solve the problem should also is both parties to solve, can not only blamed on enrollment. After all the teachers and the teaching reform in China and the problems about the system!
it like social security will reduce institutions of the pension and same, it is irreversible. And society should be move ahead. We should be progress,And at the same time that progress in solving the problem of progress.
I think, Chinese universities education although not as the quality of the United States 更多:https://www.bmcx.com/ , but for me personally, the university than no good many! This is not to diploma but really can know more knowledge, vision also will be more open.
it by university education and is no different.
in macro for, even if the quality of the college students is not so satisfactory, but relatively a big country, it should now do is improve the whole quality of the nation is not? Only the overall carry it up, the country to have a better development.Only then some elite, then execute elite governance, and it's the ancient obscurantism policy actually have no the difference.
maybe everyone will say, can be in the high school stage for the education mode like our university, but the education of the university entrance exam is can't implement mechanism inside.So in the final analysis is education system.
欢迎关注微信公众号:诚华便民查询
1、长按上方二维码,保存至手机相册;
2、进微信扫一扫,从相册中选择识别二维码。
1、长按上方二维码,保存至手机相册;
2、进微信扫一扫,从相册中选择识别二维码。